首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluating the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial High Grade Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in 10 international biopsy cohorts: results from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group.
【2h】

Evaluating the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial High Grade Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in 10 international biopsy cohorts: results from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group.

机译:在10个国际活检队列中评估前列腺癌预防试验高级前列腺癌风险计算器:前列腺活检合作组的结果。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To assess the applicability of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial High Grade (Gleason grade ≥ 7) Risk Calculator (PCPTHG) in ten international cohorts, representing a range of populations. METHODS: A total of 25,512 biopsies from 10 cohorts (6 European, 1 UK and 3 US) were included; 4 implemented 6-core biopsies, and the remaining had 10 or higher schemes; 8 were screening cohorts, and 2 were clinical. PCPTHG risks were calculated using prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination, age, African origin and history of prior biopsy and evaluated in terms of calibration plots, areas underneath the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and net benefit curves. RESULTS: The median AUC of the PCPTHG for high-grade disease detection in the 10- and higher-core cohorts was 73.5% (range, 63.9-76.7%) compared with a median of 78.1% (range, 72.0-87.6%) among the four 6-core cohorts. Only the 10-core Cleveland Clinic cohort showed clear evidence of under-prediction by the PCPTHG, and this was restricted to risk ranges less than 15%. The PCPTHG demonstrated higher clinical net benefit in higher-core compared with 6-core biopsy cohorts, and among the former, there were no notable differences observed between clinical and screening cohorts, nor between European and US cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The PCPTHG requires minimal patient information and can be applied across a range of populations. PCPTHG risk thresholds ranging from 5 to 20%, depending on patient risk averseness, are recommended for clinical prostate biopsy decision-making.
机译:目的:评估前列腺癌预防试验高等级(格里森等级≥7)风险计算器(PCPTHG)在十个国际人群中的适用性,这些人群代表一定范围的人群。方法:共纳入来自10个队列(6个欧洲,1个英国和3个美国)的25,512份活组织检查; 4例实施了6芯活检,其余的有10例或更高的方案; 8个筛查队列,2个临床队列。使用前列腺特异性抗原,直肠指检,年龄,非洲起源和既往活检史来计算PCPTHG风险,并根据校准图,受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下方的面积和净收益曲线进行评估。结果:在10核心及更高核心人群中,用于高级疾病检测的PCPTHG的AUC中位数为73.5%(范围63.9-76.7%),而在其中的78.1%(范围72.0-87.6%)四个6核心群组。只有10个核心的Cleveland Clinic队列研究显示PCPTHG预测不足的明确证据,并且仅限于风险范围小于15%。与6芯活检组相比,PCPTHG在较高芯组中显示出更高的临床净收益,在前者中,在临床组和筛查组之间以及欧洲和美国组之间均未观察到显着差异。结论:PCPTHG需要最少的患者信息,并且可以应用于各种人群。建议PCPTHG风险阈值范围为5%至20%(取决于患者的风险厌恶程度),以用于临床前列腺活检决策。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号